Select Page

Author: admin

Code Interpretation – Swimming Pool

According to the 2012 IRC, which of the following would be considered a swimming pool? A) A hot tub that contains water more than 42 inches deep B) A spa that contains water 36 inches deep C) A structure that is constructed to contain water in excess of 24 inches deep, but has a water level that is maintained at a constant 20 inches deep. D) All Of The Above     The applicability of the code provisions for swimming pools is determined by the depth/capacity of the swimming pool structure. When the structure used for swimming or recreational bathing exceeds the minimum design water depth of 24 inches it must comply with the requirements provided in Appendix G of the International Residential Code.  ...

Read More

Code Interpretation – Asphalt Shingle Installation

Question: According to the 2012 IRC, asphalt shingles shall be installed to resist the component and cladding loads specified in Table R301.2(2), adjusted for height and exposure in accordance with Table R301.2(3).   A)   TRUE B) FALSE  Answer: False                         Unlike membrane-type roof systems (built-up, single-plies), which provide for continuous air barriers, asphalt shingle systems are recognized to be air-permeable. As a result, conventional wind-test methods do not yield representative results when used on asphalt shingle roof systems. Hence, asphalt shingles are classified in accordance ASTM D7158 or ASTM D3161 to resist the maximum basic wind speed specified in Table R905.2.4.1.(1) or Table R905.2.4.1(2), not the component and cladding loads specified in Table...

Read More

Code Interpretation – Fire Separation Question

 Question: A set of plans have been submitted for a building that contains adjoining F-1 and S-1 occupancies. The documents do not show any fire separation between the two occupancies, which is allowed by Table 508.4 of the 2012 IBC. Are these occupancies considered "separated" for the purpose of calculating allowable height and area?   Answer: Yes. Although the occupancies are not required to be physically separated, for the purpose of building height and area only, they are still evaluated under the separated option. These are occupancies that share the same level of hazard with respect to fire safety. It is possible, therefore, to have multiple occupancies that comply with the separated use provisions that require no separation between them.   But note that, where code requirements are based on established fire areas, occupancies not separated must be considered as sharing the same fire area.    ...

Read More


BOAG is proud to provide its members with state recognized inspector certification program.  This program works in conjunction with ICC's industry wide accepted certification program.  This program provides for Levels 1 through V in certification with appropriate documentation to prove training and/or education...

Read More


Membership in the Association, shall be available to individuals, firms, corporations, associations, governments and government agencies interested or engaged in the administration and enforcement of regulations related to buildings and structures and their planning,...

Read More

Thank you to our Sponsors

BOAG would like to thank our SPONSORS for their support at this year’s Annual Conference!

Follow us on FB!

Remembering those on September 11 ... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook

Power out? Here's what to do ... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook

BOAG represented at the ICC National Conference. ... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook